Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Tripod Astrophotography: Part 1 - A Beginners Guide

A Beginners Guide Written By A Beginner


Photography has been a hobby of mine for many years.  I remember taking pictures as a kid with an old hand me down camera, a Kodak Brownie Starflash, which had been my mother's.  In the era of flash cubes, this camera still used flash bulbs, which luckily were still available at the time.  It also used non standard Kodak type 127 rolled film [a popular film size in the 1940's and 50's, but this was the early 1970's].  This type of film had to be manually loaded from one spool to another, and manually advanced using the numbers that showed up in the little red viewer on the back of the camera  [Remember those days kids !   :-D  ]



Later, I saved and purchased Kodak's Instant camera, which was Kodak's answer to the Polaroid for "instant" pictures.   But like many things in my life, it turned out that I purchased the wrong technology, (HD-DVD player as the latest example of this particular skill ... but that is a different story ...).   Polaroid sued Kodak for copyright infringement and won, as part of the settlement, Kodak had to stop selling this type of Camera AND STOP MAKING FILM FOR THIS CAMERA,  sending all their instant cameras to an early grave.  It wasn't until the last few years where I "graduated" to a big boy Digital Single Lens Reflex (DSLR) camera, a Canon EOS 60D.  It has been a great camera, and there has been no looking back.



One reason I love the digital age of photography so much is cost or the lack there of.  For digital photography, except for the upfront cost of equipment , there is no cost of film.  You can shoot and make as many poor shots as you want to get that one good shot.  Recently I took photographs for a school play and took somewhere in the neighborhood of  1500 shots before during and after the play.  That is the equivalent of 62 rolls of 24 exposure film.  I managed to distill these down to the "best" 400 or so images [17 rolls] after cropping and retouching.  LOL.   ...... but, I digress ....

Recently I saw an article posted on Facebook on astrophotography, that is photographs of astronomical object (moon, planets, stars, sun) mainly at night.  Upon reading the article, I discovered something that I did not know, namely, you don't need to have a telescope or a tracking mount to take quality pictures of the night time sky.  I was intrigued and began to explore.

This is the first of possibly several articles outlining what I know about the subject, a beginners guide written by a beginner.   I will try and update this blog when better info and more experience becomes available.  I will also try and correcting information which I thought was true, but found out later not to be so.

Here is the basic (minimum) equipment you need for astrophotography


  • A camera which will allow you control shutter speed (i.e. how long the shutter stays open)
  • A camera which will allow for remote control of the shutter.
  • A remote control for shutter release
  • A tripod
  • A computer (to run stacking software [I use DeepSkyStacker] & later do image processing on the "stacked" image)
  • patients
  • The ability to make mistakes and learn from those mistakes and not give up when the going get tough !





The basic theory behind tripod astrophotography is as follows.

Take lots of long exposure images of the same portion of the sky.  Use software to align the stars and "stack" a bunch of aligned images into one composite image.  Remove the noise from the composite image and finally post-process the composite image to bring out more detail.

 Now lets try to fill in some details.

Earth Rotation, Star Trails and the "Rule" of 600.

There is no getting around this one people, the earth rotates.  If you take a long exposure image (say leaving the shutter open for 1 or 2 minutes) the stars will appear as streaks in your image.  as shown below



This is happening because in the time that the shutter has been left open, the earth has rotated enough to cause the stars to "move" in the sky.  Now there is an entire class of images using this technique and they can produce some wonderful images.  I may explore this technique in some later post, but for now, I am going to assume that we are after crisp images of the night sky where the stars are not streaking.

We are left with a conundrum.  Stars, galaxies and planets are inherently faint objects to try and photograph, so we want to capture as much light as possible for a detailed image.  In order to capture enough light, we need to leave the shutter open for many seconds or minutes.  However the earth's rotation will cause streaking if we leave our shutter open for too long a period of time.  What to do ?

We can either buy an expensive tracking mount, to compensate for the earth's rotation and leave the camera shutter open for long periods of time, or we can some how figure out what is the maximum time we can leave the shutter open before stars begin to streak.  We will choose the later.

In this case we use the "Rule of 600".  Generally speaking take the focal length in mm that your lens is set to (for adjustable lenses this will usually be, between 18 mm and 55 mm or perhaps 18 mm- 135 mm).  Lets say that we set the lens to be 50 mm.  We use the equation below to compute the maximum exposure time before stars will begin to show streaks in the image.

Rule of 600

Max Exposure Time =    600 / Focal Length (in mm) 

Max Exposure Time =   600/ 50 mm

Max Exposure Time = 12 seconds

Thus in general the maximum exposure time that we can have for any single image (on a fixed tripod) at 50 mm focal length would be 12 seconds.




Setting up the camera

I am going to assume for a second that you are using a Canon DSLR.  I will most likely modify the instructions to include things such as pocket camera, etc. in the future, but to assist me in getting this information down on the page I will assume that you have my setup.  Let us also assume that we will be using a focal length of 30 mm (a rather wide field of view) to take pictures of the sky.



Put the camera into manual mode and bring up the summary screen on the back panel of the camera.  Then do the following:


  • Change the ISO to 1600
  • Change the aperture (F Setting) to the lowest number it will go (Like F5.6, F5.0, etc.)
  • Change the Exposure Time to your maximum exposure time using the Rule of 600.  In our case (30 mm focal length) this would be 20 seconds.
  • Change the picture taking type from single shot to remote/2 second delay
  • Change lighting from AWB (auto white balance) to Tungsten Lights
  • Change output format from jpeg to RAW or RAW and jpeg
You are now ready to mount your camera on your tripod.

Where are the stars

There are a lot of online programs to show star maps.  Here is one of them

http://neave.com/planetarium/

Enter your location and identify what objects are where in the sky.  Print out the map if you want or need to. Or conversely, you can just go outside and if you have a knowledge of constellations, choose your target in real time.

Example of an online map of the sky.  The grey in the image represents the Milky Way
Light Pollution, Dark Skies, Moonlight

OK people, darker is better.  We want dark skies, away from the cities, street lights, house lights, etc.  Less light pollution will mean better images.  Where I live (in central PA), we are considered "country" by many standards, but we even have light pollution.

Try finding a secluded spot, shoot away from the light pollution.  Try to shoot when the moon isn't out, or at least not in the direction you are trying to take pictures.

If you are taking images from your back yard [which I do, and I know it isn't the best], turn off the light in the house (or at least the ones that are shining on the camera).

Light kills (image quality) ..... LOL



Tripod, Aiming and Focusing

For now let us keep things simple.

Set up your tripod, but don't extend the bottom section of the legs.  You want your tripod rock solid with no movement of the camera.  The "pros" recommend an expensive tripod mount in the hundred of dollars.  I don't have that kind, mine is a $30-$50 tripod that I have had for years.  You might want to hang a weight from the center of the tripod so it just touches the ground.  Again the "experts" say this will help.  I haven't done so yet, but some of my pictures do suffer camera jitter (making them useless) so I may try this in the future.

Attach your camera to the mount on the tripod, select an area of the sky that you would like to shoot.

Now comes the critical part of focus.

Ultimately, you will need to take your camera out of auto focus mode into manual focus mode.  This is a switch on the side of the lens.  (MF/AF).

Note:  Focusing is the single most important thing.  It cannot be corrected after the fact.  It is difficult to get it right, but it is also crucial.  For beginners (like me), the auto focus method is almost fool proof.  I have had many a star taking session rendered useless because my images are out of focus.  It will happen to you as well.  Just know this in advance and try to find a method that works for you.

Focusing: Using Auto Focus

One way to focus is to use auto focus to focus on an image at infinity.  Like say the moon.  If you can do that, great.  Once you are done, put the camera on manual focus and don't touch the focus ring.

The Moon is an excellent object to "Auto Focus" on.


As noted before, having the moon present during an astro-photo shoot is not necessarily the best thing because of all the light that will bleed into the background of the image.

Focusing: Manual Focus and Test Images

If you cannot use auto focus to focus your image then put your camera in Manual Focus mode, point to the sky and turn the manual focus ring on the lens to one end and then back it off a little bit [most new lenses actually focus beyond infinity.  Now using your remote control.  Take a picture (for 20 seconds using your pre-programmed manual mode setup).  Look at the picture on the LCD panel at the back of the camera. Zoom in.  Are the stars round and in focus or fuzzy.  If fuzzy, then you need to adjust your focus a little in either direction.  Keep doing this until you feel you have the best focus possible.

It may take a while, but as I said before, Focus is critical !

Also, once in focus, do the stars appear sausage shape and not round.  If so (and in focus) then your exposure time is too long and you will need to reduce the number of second the shutter can stay open.  If this is the case go down from 20 second to 15 or 18 seconds.

Other Methods:

There are various other methods, including using the "live view" mode on LCD view screen panel, with the zoom function.  When I become more familiar with them, I will include them in this article.


Finally Taking Pictures of the Stars

If you have made it this far, congratulations.  You next step is the actually take pictures of the stars.  For your first time out take at least 10 images and I would say take 20 or 30 images.  All these images will be used to "stack" your data during processing in the next phase.

If you wish to take images of different portions of the sky (or change your zoom factor [focal length]), Mark this on your camera by taking an image with your hand covering the lens (don't touch the focus ring though).

Here is an example (untouched) of a single star frame.

Raw unprocess unstacked single image (frame) that contains the Milky Way



Other Images:

When you are done with your star pictures you need to take some dark and flat images.  These images will be used by the stacking software to remove noise from your star ("light") images.

dark files:

Using the same settings (ISO, shutter speed, aperture) as your star images, put the lens cap on and take 20 images.  These are your dark files and will be used to filter out camera noise, "hot pixels" with the stacking software.

flat files:

Using the same ISO setting as your star images, set the shutter speed as fast as it can be (for the Canon 60D this is 1/8000 of a second).  Put the lens cap on and take 20 images.  These will be used in the stackin operation to again reduce sensor noise.


Stacking Software:

We next come to the computer part of our exercise.   For this I use a freeware program which is called Deep Sky Stacker (DSS).  This is a program that runs on the Windows operating system, and it can be found at the following link:

DeepSkyStacker

Here also is a link for the users group, which also has the latest beta version.

main window for DeepSkyStacker windows program


Deep Sky Stacker is a program which detects stars within each image, aligns the images, and adds the images together (stack them), so that faint, almost undetectable stars, nebula's,  galaxies become visible. By adding images together (mathematically) you essentially are increasing your exposure time of your image, and thus able to see more details.  It also through the use of flat files and dark files reduce the noise in the final image.

From a scientific standpoint you are increasing the signal to noise ratio by:

  • Increasing the signal [stacking] ..and.. 
  • reducing the noise [dark & flat frames].


I will eventually include much more detail about DSS, for now I refer you to this article which outlines step by step how to use the software.

http://flintstonestargazing.com/2009/06/26/my-quick-deepskystacker-tutorial/

Basically, the steps for using the program are as follows:

  • Click on "Open Picture Files" located on upper left of window.  Select your star images (either jpeg or RAW)
  • Click on "Dark Files" and select your dark file images
  • Click on "Flat Files" and select your flat file images
  • Click on "Check All" to select all images for processing
  • Click on "Register Checked Pictures"
  • Click on the "advanced Tab" Move the slider bar to somewhere between 10 and 30 and click on "Compute the Number of Detected Star".  If this number is around 50 you are good.  Higher or lower, adjust the slider and recompute.
  • Once you have done this click OK and let the stacking begin.  [There are many more parameters you could adjust but for simplicity sake, keep the defaults for now]
  • This might take a while depending on the quality of the images and the quantity of images any where from 15 minutes to a couple of hours.
  • When the stacking is complete it will display an image on the screen.  Click on "Save Picture To File" on the left hand side.  jpeg format is not an option, so you must save this as a TIFF image.

Note:  The "official" version of the program (Version 3.3.2) is having problem reading in the RAW format of the Canon camera and will only work with jpeg images.  The beta version found on the DSS users group page will work with the RAW format.  Initially I suggest using jpeg images and when you are comfortable with the program you can download the beta version for use with RAW images.

Image Processing:

Apart from getting quality images, this is one of the most important steps, and I must admit the one that I am weakest at.  Basically you need to do 2 things

  • Find a dark non starry patch in the image and set this as the base color
  • Adjust the curve of the rest of the image to bring out the stars, gas clouds etc.  without making the entire image too bright.
Many people use Photoshop and Photoshop like programs for this step.  I don't own a copy of Photoshop however.  The TIFF images used for processing are 16 bits for each of the Red, Green and Blue layers.

I use a freeware program called GIMP.  The problem with this is that it only processes the data (RGB) in 8 bits per channel, thus I lose a great deal of resolution.  However this is the best I can do for now.

Here is an article on some suggestions on how to do some final image processing on the images coming out of DSS.


For comparison sake here is  a single unprocessed image vs a stacked fully processed image for a star field.



Lastly here is a fully registered stacked and post processed image showing part of the Milky Way gas cloud.  This was obtained from 30 images of 10 second exposure each, at ISO 1600.  So far this is my best final image.  This was probably my 5th or 6th photography session ever and I was very happy with the results.



Odds and Ends

If you want some more information and have about 20 minutes, here is a very informative youtube video that shows the entire process of picture taking, stacking and post processing.  If you are actually interested in doing astrophotography, I highly recommend this video.






Summing it all up:

This has been a very brief overview on backyard astrophotography.  I am not an expert, nor do I play one on TV.  I am learning along the way, making some mistakes, but certainly having a lot of fun doing it !  I will update this page as my knowledge and techniques become more refined so check back every so often.

My goal is mainly to have fun, but also to take some interesting images.  Once I refine my techniques I will be attempting to photograph some deep sky objects like the Andromeda galaxy and the whirlpool galaxy, along with the Orion nebula.  Everyone needs a goal.

Now get out there and take some images and enjoy yourself !



Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Curious George and The Initial Teaching Alphabet

I haven't blogged in quite some time.  Busy with life and various project.  I received my first official comment on a blog post the other day, and it inspired to write this blog entry.

I recently acquired an Initial Teaching Alphabet copy of Curious George [circa 1965] and wanted to share with the world.

Disclaimer:  Scholastic - I am not trying to violate any copyright laws.  I am displaying these book pages because I feel it has some actual historical significance on how NOT to teach reading and writing.  If we don't learn from history, we are bound to repeat it !

One humorous note:  I obtained this book off ebay.  The seller listed this as a foreign language book, possibly in French.  I do agree, it WAS written in a foreign language, LOL.



cuerius jorj - front cover

cuerius jorj - page 1

cuerius jorj - page 2, 3

cuerius jorj - page 4, 5

cuerius jorj - page 6, 7

cuerius jorj - page 8, 9

cuerius jorj - page 10, 11

cuerius jorj - page 12, 13

cuerius jorj - page 14, 15

cuerius jorj - page 16, 17

cuerius jorj - page 18, 19


cuerius jorj - page 20, 21

cuerius jorj - page 22, 23

cuerius jorj - page 24, 25

cuerius jorj - page 25, 26

cuerius jorj - page 27, 28

cuerius jorj - page 29, 30

cuerius jorj - page 31, 32

cuerius jorj - page 33, 34

cuerius jorj - page 35, 36

cuerius jorj - page 37, 38

cuerius jorj - page 39, 40

cuerius jorj - page 41, 42

cuerius jorj - page 43, 44

cuerius jorj - page 45, 46

cuerius jorj - page 47

cuerius jorj - back cover




Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Hobbies & Antiques

I'm not old .... I would prefer the term vintage or antique, thank you 


It's funny when I was younger, items that were 20, 30 or more years old were just called "old" or "junk"..  Sometimes you might be embarrassed (or were embarrassed  to own them or have to use them.. Now that I'm older those same things are called "vintage" "art deco" or "antique".  Back in the day you were poor (or at least not "well to do") if you had old things, now in some cases (depending on what the item is) in order to have antiques you might need to be slightly "well to do"

I have always had a fascination with vintage and antique items of all types.  Don't get me wrong, I love internet, cell/smart phones, 4G, HDTV, Netflix and Dolby surround sound, blue ray and the like, but I have an appreciation for technology and styles of the past.


My first dabbling with antiques and vintage items were some of the cars I owned.  When I was a teenager and in my early 20's I purchased some vintage vehicles (in other words old or clunkers) for my own personal transportation.  I had a car [actually more like a TANK] from the early 1950's and also owned a sharp looking convertible shown below.

Chevy Corvair convertible.  Engine in back, trunk in the front



Early 50's Buick
This car was 20 feet long, weighed 4000 lbs and got 8 mpg.  A Straight 8 Engine and 6V Electrical System
 
These cars were junkers, but I learned a thing or two about auto repair and older technology, and when they weren't in the repair shop. (Which they were quite often), they were extremely fun to drive and were definitely "head turners" !

My more recent hobbies have been Phones, Tube Radios and vintage electric clocks.

I had always wanted an old telephone since my teenage years.  They looked cool and were unique, but unfortunately, the availability and price was just too much to overcome.  A few years ago I rediscovered my interest in old phone and made my first purchase.  This was Western Electric model 202 from the late 1920's/early 1930's.  This phone was a desk phone and had a rotary dial, but did not have an enclosed ringer.  The ringer (and some other parts) were housed in a rectangular box know as a "subset" [or ringer box].  The model 202 phone is shown in the photo below as the phone to the right of the radio.

Western Electric Model 302 and 202 telephones.

Later on after the phone "bug" took hold, I acquired a candlestick phone.

Western Electric Model 151 Rotary Dial Candlestick Phone


At that point I started poking around on some bulletin board specific to old phone.  I found that not only did I like owning them, but I was also interested in how they work.  I focused in on a slightly newer phone the Western Electric Model 302.  This model was the first phone to have an internal ringer and was manufactured between 1937 and 1954.  The model 302 was  my first attempted at a restoration. 

The restoration involved taking apart the entire phone, cleaning all of the components, sending the dial out for maintenance  recovering the leather feet, wet sanding the case to remove scratches, and then polishing, and replacing or cleaning/repairing the wires to the handset and wall.



Before Photo




Partially disassembled


Shell sanded to remove scratches.  Waiting to be polished





Base of phone with cleaned parts re-installed and newly recovered leather feet waiting to be installed





Finished product.  Good as new and ready for another 60 years of use.

My first attempt came out very well.   I have since restored about a dozen phones.  Including the Western Electric Model 554 wall phone and the rotary dial princess phone.

Western Electric Model 354 Wall Phones Circa 1948


Princess Phone Circa 1959


Of all these restorations,  some were donated for charity raffles, some were gifts and others were for my families own personal use.  In all cases the phones were restored to working order at or near their original condition.  It is a great hobby that is very satisfying.

You don't need to restore phones or hang glide to have a relaxing hobby.  Hike, walk, take pictures, do anything but stay active and have a hobby or two.  You'll keep your sanity a little longer if you do.